Национально-освободительное движение депутата Фёдорова

Continuing the theme of the so-called National Liberation Movement (NOD) MP Fedorov raised VOINR USSR in recent publications offer you the testimony of a former activist NOD (National Liberation Movement) , materials, personal correspondence with VOINR asset GCD and conclusion of the Secretariat of illegal VOINR activities of this organization would infringe on the constitutional order in Russia and the Soviet Union — complicity in the coup. However expound in order.

1. Interview activist GCD, who left the organization. (excerpt)

G. — Alexander, well, once you are so active in the GCD that you even included in the Higher Political Council, and to my knowledge was offered the post of coordinator of regions, why you abandoned these proposals and withdrew from the GCD?

AT — Aslan the fact that the first question that I had it was a figure of Mikhail Dvorkovich in the party, which at that time was called «Free Russia», but Eugene A. said Dvorkovich simply included in the advisory council at the party and that it is a signal oligarchs that they were going to cooperate with Putin and GCD. Next Fedorov said that in March 2013 will be a criminal case against Gorbachev and then by the collapse of the Soviet Union, said that Putin’s strong enough to change the rhetoric of the media for two weeks and this will be enough to break the information blockade. When it was in March, nothing happened and Fedorov started giving other promises, which also did not come true, or that he did not personally served, namely said that the coordinators will GCD chairmen of the regional offices of the party «Free Russia» — «National Course» promised that will lead to «the people of Putin» in regional authorities promised that the media issue has been resolved, and that our activities will cover (rallies, pickets Bryansk Branch conducted over two years but have never been covered by any regional or TV the federal TV channels). That is so fed breakfast Fedorov and his assistant Denis Ganic, and when nothing happened, appealed to the civic consciousness.

Meanwhile, this activity began to occupy almost all the time and was the work in which you work for the benefit of Fedorov and his assistants (by the way in Ganic salary was around 100 thousand. Rub., A lot of money was spent on the maintenance of staff, half of which employees do not understand what worked) and coordinators in the regions lost their jobs, married his wife began to saw, I know personally about 5 coordinators who have problems in families began on this occasion. Then I found out (who are interested take a look at the winners of the grant competitions major operators grants) that organizations affiliated with Fedorov receive grants, the total income on which tens of millions of rubles. For example, only the assistant Fedorov Kovalenko (it registered the party «National Deal») received a Eurasian Youth Union in 2012, led by a grant of $ 3 million rubles http://www.odnako.org/blogs/komu-i -pochemu-dostalis-byudzhetnie-granti-v-2012-godu / . I began to raise questions, judge for yourself: this team gets tens of millions only grants have a great relationship with Dvorkovich, who also has his serious social circle rich people who can easily give money to the GCD, Fedorov indicates the presence of administrative resources and personal support for Putin, but in the region do not give a penny, how to understand this?

If GCD raises serious goal, to achieve them need the money, this is an obvious thing that speaks and the historical experience of the militia of Minin and Pozharsky. And this is one side of the coin, the other was the fact that, contrary to Fedorov about disfranchised Putin across Russia held mass rallies in support of the Crimea. Only in Bryansk was about 5 000 people, it becomes obvious that if the team will give Vladimir Putin, in support of the policy of sovereignty or amendment of the Constitution in each region can leave thousands of people, led by the regional administration. The question arises: why Putin for this GCD, which numbered in the regions measured in tens of people? As well as the media have not two weeks, and for a year, they say and show quite frankly and truthfully about sovereignty, the unipolar world and the US role in it. What do we have? And it turns out that the leadership of Nod telling the truth, to the GCD there, guided by their own interests.

Further, I learned that the assistant Fedorov — Ganic, participated in advocacy campaigns against the Russian army at Radio Liberty, which according to Putin is a division of the CIA. I wrote about this text message Fedorov, but he could not explain what makes his assistants person who the Titans «fifth column», as Lyudmila Alexeeva throw mud at our army. Again, the presence of stars in TNT Volodchenko GCD is puzzling. All these facts and many others (for example, some high-ranking officials, came close Fedorov information in clear text that GCD nothing to do with Putin does not have that coordinators simply use to solve their problems for free) led to the understanding that Fedorov uses popular theme Running ahead of the locomotive and her PR, solving their questions and raising their political status. Realizing this, a great desire to work in the GCD I was gone.

AG — Alexander, that is, do you assess the activity of GCD as a positive, but not associated with Vladimir Putin?

AT — No, Aslan, I really thought at one time, but then began to lean toward the idea that the GCD linked to extremist forces that aim at the implementation of a coup in Russia. The fact that the liberal project failed, so the whole fifth column (not just the US, UK, Germany, and the fifth column of supranational elites) began work on the patriotic field. Some of them aim to remove Putin and clean up the political space for the project of construction of the World State in which Russia must play its role for her. Details about these processes can be found here http://ivan555iva.livejournal.com/ . Plan to do this? Options are approximately: to say that Russia occupied Putin with us, but without rights and we must help him to free their homeland and under the sauce to bring people into extremist activities. Can generally be said that Putin was killed and his double on the throne.

The last straw was already substituting in particular against me by Denis Ganic. He called and asked to place the information on our regional website that we run a job to receive refugees from the Ukraine, at the same time promised to support the material resources to coordinate work with the executive authorities, and justify the need for a request to this initiative has gone below for more political effect. On the day I was going on a business trip, it was evening and I complied with the request, who is opposed to aid the brotherly people?

The next day, Fedorov made ​​a statement that the headquarters of the Bryansk NOD (National Liberation Movement) is working on Refugees. The post I started to receive requests for housing in large numbers, and the responses from those who provide housing were rare. But how can you let people in the house of his countrymen did not know what kind of people, if they have not been tested corresponding structures? So it is no much can come activists’ right quadrant «and compassionate family to settle in the guise of men» Berkut «or militias. Realizing that the leadership of Nod as always lied, and even framed, I asked Dennis Ganic place the information on the admission of refugees without reference to the headquarters of the Bryansk, because he did not want to engage in frank populism, and even in the organization of illegal channels of migration flows to the territory Russia. Yet the portal Rusnod and left hanging a banner on the organization of the Bryansk headquarters GCD refugee reception. I posted the information on our website, it’s a matter of competence of the FMS, and not the headquarters of Nod, and the ad itself deleted. Despite this a few weeks in the portal banner hung Rusnod.

But the most interesting that a couple of days I got a call from the Interior Ministry units to combat extremism and asked about the reception of refugees. I explained that I have a few days on our website such announcement and no real work is not carried out, the issue was settled. But imagine what could be if we were teammates started to kind of work? The answer is simple: there would be a natural thing a criminal case, and then the node would say that our associates pursue the occupation forces in uniform. It finally dispelled the doubts, and I can firmly say that I am not on the road with this organization, while I support Putin and I consider it necessary to continue to implement policies aimed at strengthening the sovereignty of Russia. In fact, all of these positions are set out in the statutes of the Popular Front and therefore not quite understand why you need a dwarf NOD (National Liberation Movement) .

AG — Alexander, how do you think, why coordinators remain in the GCD, despite such obvious strangeness?

AT — There are different reasons, but it’s hard to admit yourself that you were wrong that so much effort is applied in the wrong direction, it can only strong-willed people. On the other hand, someone is waiting for the moment when to begin the real events that every time the guide tells the GCD, it is pleasant to feel that they are involved in a significant, necessary business, which fills a person’s life with new meanings. Someone just too trusting, and once believed Fedorov, became not able to adequately think. Many coordinators, especially those who have been at the beginning, or those who have recently NOD — it’s wonderful people, people with a warm heart, love their motherland, wishing her good. Yet we must remember that faith in the truth saves, but faith in a lie ruins.

There are narrow circle of people — careerists, receiving money in the GCD that are in positions — they are ready to support anything, although not all of them myself to admit it, finding various excuses for their actions. In early 2014, one of the coordinators (after agreeing with Fedorov) we organized several coordinators meeting with the new head of staff at the time of Nod — Svetlana Grishanin. We were told about the following: GCD — PR is a social wing of the party «National Deal», ask the coordinator nobody is going to give any resources also do not intend to. The question whether there is in the party leadership surname Dvorkovich, said that she does not know who is at the helm of the party. On the outcome of this meeting and the negotiations that took place there, known to many coordinators, but also continue to be in the GCD. How Come? Someone in the hope of ephemeral privileges, someone thinks that it keeps Russia.

However, I, in any case, do not blame any of the activists GCD, because everyone has the right to do what it sees fit. The truth must be understood that the time will come when you have to answer for their actions, so it is hardly reasonable to discard the facts underlying surface and obvious, while fanatically believe in the theory of communication konspiralogicheskie GCD with Putin, who are without any one objective arguments in their favor. Source http movement)

If you swallowed the poison take — the antidote
If NODom poisoned — we offer Anti-GCD
национально-освободительное движение

anti-nod 2. Documented correspondence with asset GCD, with minor cuts in the place where permitted non-literary expression, as well as openly unceremoniously offered bribes, apparently for refusing to engage in further opening of the criminal objectives and activities of the organization.

Dear reader, an activist of Nod!

My question to you E.Fёdorovu and the incompatibility of its approval of the loss of sovereignty of the Russian Federation in connection with the contents of para. 4 of Art. 15 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

He argues that the primacy of international treaties over the laws of the Russian Federation forms the colonial dependence of Russia from the West.

Firstly, there is no international agreement on its own, but only as a result of its signature and ratification by the legislature and not otherwise, if it is an interstate agreement.

For example, the first Fedorov made up of deputies of the State Duma voted for the ratification of the bonded contract for joining the WTO, and then goes on to record video of foreign occupation and pay tribute with the consent of the people who betrayed the greedy West. The course of the original — a creative approach to business.

Second, the sovereignty of the Russian Federation, fortunately, can not be lost from the legal point of view, since it is not terminated by the Union Treaty on the Creation of the USSR, and the laws of the Union republics and above the laws enshrined in Article 74 of the Constitution of the USSR in 1977. The Constitution in force, acts as amended as of the 90 th year and Russia, according to her own law on international treaties, is the successor of the Soviet Union, that is the same as the Soviet Union, and not the legal successor of the USSR (the successor occur at the termination of the subject).

And who can say that the USSR was not sovereign and dependent and colonial state ?!

Union Treaty in force and the results of the referendum March 17, 91 in place.
This is recognized by the State Duma of the Russian Federation in its judgment of 15.03.1996 n 157-ii DG on the validity FOR RUSSIA — RUSSIA USSR results of the referendum on 17 March 1991 on the conservation the Soviet Union.

In connection with the question: do not you think that except para. 4, Art. 15 of the subordination of the Union Russia international treaty, you are committing a criminal offense under the laws of both the USSR and the Russian Federation. Because here and there it is considered as an attack on national sovereignty and constitutional order? (See. The Act of Union of gosprestupleniyah from ’58 and the Criminal Code)

(национально-освободительное движение)

Since n. 4 tbsp. 15 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation is the meaning of the identical content of Article 74 of the Constitution of the USSR m Declaration of State Sovereignty of the Russian Federation, in the sense that connects the Republic and the Union as the legal basis — the rule of law over the laws of the Republic of the Union, the organization of activities aimed at breaking this connection and the Republic of the Union is nothing more than separatism and encroachment on gossuverenitet Soviet Union and Russia, an attack on the foundations of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation, maybe, Article 15 is attributed to the basics of the system.

At the same time, public opinion in Russia introduced figures GCD misleading with respect to the colonial status of the Russian Federation. That’s a lie, no colonial dependence in the Russian Federation is not, no surrender, no one signed and stored in a fully legal status of exactly the same as before the adoption of the Constitution 93. That is, the Russian Federation continues through n. 4 tbsp. 15 K.RF content is subject to the rules of the union of the international treaty establishing the USSR.

Incorrect and falsely interpreted only the content itself n. 4 tbsp. 15, when it intentionally and in bad faith interpretation of drops that the Union Treaty is an international. It is only when such circumstances may default to mislead the general public false assertions about the occupation and non-sovereign Russian Federation.

In my opinion, as an expert in the field of law, the purpose of a citizen of the USSR Fedorov, and he has not lost the citizenship of the Union, acts actually attempt to legalize the Yeltsin coup in Russia in 1993 (Decree №1400) and legal registration of the USSR out of the will of the people of Russia.

However, this attempt is untenable, since the referendum of the Russian Federation can not overcome the All-Union referendum 17 March 91. But will lead to serious consequences and many victims in the name of preserving the Soviet Union in stolen property privatization. (Asked VOINR President Putin on Where did the property of citizens of the USSR, the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, the Russian Foreign Ministry and the Ministry of Economic Development to answer difficult, concluded that they ordered the first Russian president Boris Yeltsin, which is extremely absurd from a legal point of view.)

Under the rule of law of the Union is impossible without violation of their conduct criminal privatization. The question of illegal privatization has not been solved so far, and therefore attracting participants in the referendum to amend the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Russian part of the submission to the laws of the Union, Fedorov thus tries to legalize retroactively the results of the criminal privatization, bringing the Russian Federation under the rule of the laws of the Union. We are talking about the legal registration of a coup in the Soviet Union and the legalization of stolen property in the privatization attributable to the state equals public property of Soviet citizens.

Since I am a citizen of the USSR and am a member of the organization of Soviet citizens — VOINR USSR responsibly declare a citizen of the USSR E. Fedorov that he would be prosecuted for violating the coup in the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation.

Activities activists GCD, falls under the signs of complicity in the coup, after they officially will explain what are the criminal purpose of the motion.

The criminal case of attempted gospervorot in the USSR and the Russian Federation will be considered a people’s court formed under the laws of the USSR, subject to the rule of law over the laws of the Russian Federation.

(национально-освободительное движение)

Served as deputy Gabriel
Gabriel tatupedom reputed
And on her forehead a roguish
What used to steal? — The question froze

Stole apartment, car slyamzili
Tube pulled that along the cordon
When asked what are you doing?
— so there is a fifth column !!!

Unscrew the two balloons
and kativshi them in the night
, «This is the fifth pillar !!!»
stentorian voice shouts

int_1 Objection activist GCD:

Dear, umichesssr!
This is not about international treaties. They all just clear. We are talking about the universally recognized principles and norms of international law, which in themselves are an integral part of the Russian legislation, which produce specialized agencies. Plenum of the Supreme Court explained in decision 5 from 10.10.2003. I propose to study the document.

Sincerely,
Rustam Usarov (национально-освободительное движение) Dear Rustam, all international law based solely international treaties. No exceptions to this rule no. Distinction in Article 15 and in the resolution referred to you the Supreme Court is not the type of acts — that is, acts of de mol — contracts and that there acts — the principles of international law (such as the principles of acts not). Contract is a form of consolidation rules, and the rules themselves and the principles contained in the text of the treaty. Therefore, the assertion that the contracts can be without rules and without principles (fundamental principles) and principles without contracts — is absurd. The principles of this content, and is a form of contracts and their method of consolidation. Agreements in the field of international relations varied, there are some that contain rules for the interpretation of norms and principles m.pr .. For example, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969. USSR joined this Act and for the Russian Federation and the Russian Federation before it became mandatory by virtue of following the laws of the Union. No violation of state or national sovereignty is not here. Tc is equal relations of countries is regulated by international treaties.

Therefore be written in the Constitution that we fulfill international treaties themselves, but do not fulfill the principles — the fundamental principles of international law — it is impossible in principle. This illiterate legally and illogical in terms of common sense.

In addition, the validity of such m. Purchase contracts only if they are authorized persons and bodies. Authorities of the Russian Federation are not authorized persons to change the international treaties of the USSR, maybe their competence below. Therefore, no international treaties of the Russian Federation, the Yeltsin period and then, if they are in conflict with the instruments of international law concluded on behalf of the Union, have no legal significance. They are negligible for both prmera Belovezhskoe Agreement. Action is the only such acts that do not violate the acts of the Allied authorities and the Department of Foreign Affairs.

Therefore, there is no reason for concern about the loss of sovereignty by signing international agreements invalid on behalf of the Russian Federation. The Russian Federation is protected in international relations, the status of the USSR. Void acts of sovereignty is not lost, but only mislead public opinion. That is the opinion of ignorant people about non-existent circumstances. Another issue is the criminal actions of individuals in the control system of the Russian Federation, but these effects are not corrected by changes in the constitution, and remedial actions and the actions of the law enforcement system of the citizens themselves. Change the rules (laws and constitution) despite the fact that the reason for their criminal failure specific individuals — is absurd. Or substitution of the thesis. I showed this with an example one child stealing apples from another. After stealing the one who stole the offers that someone stole the vote that steal no longer, instead of returning stolen. Here GCD and agrees to this option and agitate others — decide that steal no longer, but retouches the question of what is the fate of the already stolen? Thus attempts to legalize the theft itself substitution of concepts. Promaktivy USSR itself re-register, and the victim, like a fool carrot invited to vote for amendments to the Constitution of disobedience to the principles of international law.

(национально-освободительное движение)
Opposition activist GCD

ХХХХ@rusnod.ru added on 22.03.2015
You idiots, here is my review.
The guys from VOINR not all right in the head. Morons down and out that’s all.
(национально-освободительное движение)
Opposition activist GCD

Good day!

Do not look for a black cat in a dark room. Laws is a cart,
pulled by a horse. Where the horse pulls a cart there and goes.
We need to see without laws, we do not have sovereignty. Well, if it is not
visible, then delve into the laws that are made ​​up so that
you can interpret them in any way.
And throw their responsible application in the trash. It is better to do
something useful for the family, for the neighbors.

Eugene. (национально-освободительное движение) Opposition activist GCD

Today at 18:00

Patient adnaka you fancy!

Valery Makarov
HHH@mail.ru
=== A:

Thank you for your feedback. Dialogue logged.
Your opinion will be taken into account. (национально-освободительное движение) A Nod activist

Alex IHHHv
ХХХХХХХХХ@gmail.com

Hello. Excuse me, do not know how to contact you. Your analysis is certainly worthy of attention and has a right to exist.
Who has no regrets about the collapse of the Soviet Union has no heart, who wants to recreate it no mind. Prime Minister Vladimir Putin
has already grown up a generation of people who were not born in the USSR. Interestingly, and how many are still alive in the world of people who lived more in a monarchy? And why does not the question arises about the revival of the monarchy was overthrown because it is not legal? And why we do not consider the question of the social structure to the Epiphany of Russia, because Christianity was imposed on us, why have broken mop right?
I understand all your concerns and I do not care about the fate of our homeland, believe me, I love her as much as you, the point is not form and content. We live now in global capitalism, and all authorities, culture, media, and as a consequence of people’s minds, sent to the system of values.
With regard to the activities of Nod, what I want to tell you, about you, I can still hear in the first, but the Naudet says the whole country. God bless him with Fedorov, this format allows me access to a large audience and talk about the problems, to involve people in local government and take charge of their own lives. You’d better have joined together and began to build socialism. Thank you.
(национально-освободительное движение)

Answer:

«It has grown a generation of people who were not born in the USSR.»

The Soviet Union is a union of nations, there is a contract between them. You are presented with evidence that the contract is not terminated in Bialowieza, and that Russia — the successor of the Soviet Union (Decree of the State Duma and the Law on International Treaties of the Russian Federation)
No facts exit citizens of Soviet citizenship was not the abolition of the law on citizenship as well and can not be, maybe, State Duma shall not be entitled to cancel the federal law. All were born in the Soviet Union after 90 years, no less than the citizens of the Union and you. Citizenship in the USSR, double and even triple. See Article 1 of the Law on Citizenship of the USSR. As a citizen of the Republic at the same time you are a citizen of the USSR and successfully to this day.
If you have any evidence for the termination of his Soviet citizenship on the grounds specified in zaokne, then ask them to tell, maybe this is a unique case and it should be investigated. Acts or termination of citizenship are presidential decrees or regulations of the USSR Supreme Soviet Presidium of the Union republics.

About the monarchy.

No illegally overthrown the monarchy was not in Russia. You have introduced a false stamp. Renunciation autocrat was voluntary, as failure of his brother too. Documents are available in the network. Reason for the revival of the monarchy, in the sense of restoring the rule of law, no. But to restore the rule of law in connection with violation of the will of the people as expressed in the referendum 17 March 91 — is.
Baptism is certainly not irrelevant to the status and rights of citizens. Do not confuse charisma with scrambled eggs. We’re talking now about the constitution of the Russian Federation gosudastvennom status and the status of citizens and not on religious beliefs. In particular, Article 15 of the Russian AK.

(национально-освободительное движение)
Opposition activist GCD

Dear, umichesssr!

1. Please clarify and provide documented in what, when and with whom the prisoners international treaties Russia has recognized the primacy of the principles and norms of international law over Russian legislation that are valid at the present time.
2. Explain how contracts are no longer prisoners of the existing states of the USSR have the legal force of the Russian legislation?
3. As a leading GCD Discussion Club invites you to a discussion on this topic.
Offer Your name meeting (video recording of the meeting on YouTube).
Make a plan for major issues, to be dealt with.
I think it will be very interesting and useful meeting. (национально-освободительное движение ) Answer:

Quote — «In what, when and with whom the prisoners international treaties Russia has recognized the primacy of the principles and norms of international law over the Russian law»

Dear Andrew.

This is a question to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, maybe the whole system of international treaties and the classification of you no one present except the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. Part of the agreement and have the closed character.
I also know that for you it is no secret — an agreement with the European Union joining the Council of Europe on the ECHR jurisdiction on cases of human rights and of the WTO Agreement, a production sharing agreement with regards to subsoil . You can also mention the agreement on the transfer of the territory of China, the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation and the Agreement with Norway on the assignment of the territorial waters of the USSR and the Russian Federation. Handover of the territory of the Russian Federation and so on.
In all these cases, the Russian Federation is guided by the priority of international treaties over domestic law of the Russian Federation and the Soviet Union and grossly violated domestic law and its international treaty on the Soviet Union.

These cases do not refer to Russia, as you know, and to abuse the rights of specific officials, apparently not the most unselfish reasons, maybe when ehtom caused enormous harm to the interests of Russia eq. Mix the same concept and Russia concluded the president of the Russian Federation signed inappropriate, maybe, action by an authorized representative may not go beyond the mandate or evade the interests of the principal. Actions of this kind — in violation of the law and in violation of the interests of the principal shall be null and void. A perelinkovka them (renaming) in the actions of Russia performs a screen to conceal the gross violations.

With regard to the universally recognized norms and principles that set out in the acts of the United Nations and in the form of a convention as a rule. Details can be read in a special resolution of the Plenum of the RF Armed Forces and to see, for instance, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969 — International Convention, embodies the fundamental norms of international law relating to the conclusion, entry into force, application, termination m. Contracts. Or «Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.» (Enclose in Rome 04.11.1950).

I request not to perform, and services do not accept, so the remaining issues can briefings and consultations to address in paid consultations or public institutions.
If you do not clearly understand me, then let me remind you that we are now is not about my request and your service, and on unacceptable criminal aims of the movement of nodes. In its advertising, and I do not need because of your flattering offers — video recording of the meeting on YouTube, is forced to give up. (национально-освободительное движение)

Answer activist GCD

In response to your message activists GCD (copy below) sent to me nodovskuyu mail reports the following:

I fully agree, and even have something to add to the position of the presence, protection n. 4 tbsp. 15 in the Constitution, but being out of certain system harder to change its essence, the vector targets, and taking into account the almost total zombie population, and especially the assets of various movements, movements, including such advanced as GCD, KPE, such ONF the task becomes almost impossible, because everything that has more or less alternative direction than voiced guide position is found by an ardent aversion to not overlapped aggression, accusations of all mortal sins and may even lead to sowing doubt in the minds of the congregation, at luck, which shoots immediately weed out the most odious of its representatives willfully or unwittingly …
With same status as the coordinator of the corresponding movement in the presence of a certain prestige in the region, and even in the presence of awards, merit your chances to spread not only constructive doubt in the minds of the lost, but and at least let them take root and sprout several orders of magnitude greater than the possibility of impact from the outside.
I understand that in the administration of true justice, with my clandestine activities, in this situation can be held liable for the anti-people activities in education, but for the reasons set out above in force their internal beliefs and understanding of the situation in a different feel to do even greater crime … (национально-освободительное движение ) BUT, in fact, Russia may ratify international treaties only those that were profitable. Or am I not right?

Yes, Olga, you are absolutely right. Therefore, to exclude Article 15 or part of the Constitution of the Russian Federation there is no reason for its sovereignty. Suffice it to review those international treaties that are not profitable and denounce them, and enter only those that are beneficial. To do this, led dances in the squares is not necessary. To do this, voters should put under strict contractual control of their elected representatives — deputies and the president and to hold them accountable whenever and immediately as soon as these representatives of the people shy away from its responsibilities towards corruption and treason.
And you just traitors and lead the process fight against traitors and taken the wrong way — not to control the people of the host for their would-be members, but to change the articles of the constitution, which connects the small Russian (RSFSR and the Russian Federation) and Russian great — the USSR. That is, the movement of organized and headed for yourself separatists and traitors zadurit people’s heads empty slogans similar to patriotic.

= (национально-освободительное движение) =

3. Conclusion:

Secretariat of the OIC VOINR USSR continue public investigation into the assassination attempt on the foundations of the constitutional system in the Russian Federation against the sovereignty and gosprestuplenii

USSR organizers of the movement GCD and prepare the indictment to be submitted to the elected People’s Court formed under the law of the USSR.

Particularly noteworthy is the fact that according to information in the media with the initiative of a similar nature — on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation (excluding Article 15 h. 4), was made head of the TFR. Recall that it is directly subordinate to the President of the Russian Federation Putin and hard to imagine that he did it arbitrarily and without the consent of the latter. And, therefore, the case takes an extremely dangerous character, if attempted unconstitutional coup comes directly from the guarantor of citizens’ constitutional rights. It seems this tradition is already systematic (Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Putin now). At the time to think about whether it needs such a position in the system of public administration of the USSR and the Russian Federation, as well as other republics, which became the path of separatism immediately after the introduction of such positions. In my opinion, this position generally poorly compatible with democracy.